|
As I understand it, a kangaroo court is so called because it is
a burlesque performance where the process of the law takes heart-stopping
leaps and bounds.Out of curiosity, I looked up the entry on kangaroos
in the Encyclopedia Britannica to see how far these marsupial mammals
can clear in a leap. Apparently the record is 13.5 meters.This is
far superior to the Olympics long- jump record. It is no surprise
then that the erratic course of justice in a kangaroo court is outside
the bounds of normal human conduct.
I have written about the challenges that political dissidents in
Burma have to face. Everybody committed to taking an active part
in the endeavor to return the country to democracy has to be prepared
to go to prison at any time. It usually happens in the middle of
the night, appropriately, as there can be fewer deeds more akin
to darkness than that of depriving innocent people of a normal,
healthy life. The ones most vulnerable to arrest are members of
the NLD.
Many of them are already seasoned jail veterans who, at casual
moments, exchange prison yarns and instruct the as yet uninitiated
on such matters as the kind of treatment they can expect at the
interrogation sessions and what they should take with them when
the banging on the door comes: change of clothing, soap, toothpaste
and toothbrush, medicines, a blanket or two, etcetera, all in a
plastic bag. Nothing so respectable as a knapsack or suitcase is
per mitted. And do not be fooled if the people who turn up at the
door, usually without a warrant, say that they will only be keeping
you for a few days. That could well translate into a 20-year sentence.
When U Win Htein, a key member of my office staff, was arrested
one night last May, he had a bag already packed. He had previously
spent six years in Insein Jail: He was one of the people taken away
from my house in 1989 on the day I was detained and he was released
only in February 1995. When U Win Htein asked those who had come
to take him away whether they had an arrest warrant, they replied
that it was not necessary as charges had already been moved against
him and his sentence had been decided. So much for the concept of
the law that deems a person innocent until proven guilty. Section
340 (1) of the Code of Criminal Procedure provides that " any person
accused of an offense before a criminal court, or against who proceedings
are instituted under this code, in any such court, may of right
be defended by a pleader." This basic right to counsel is systematically
denied to political prisoners in Burma. They are not even allowed
to make contact with their families.
The authorities generally refuse to give any information on detainees
who have not yet been tried. The NLD and the families of political
prisoners have to make strenuous inquiries to find out where they
are, with what "crime"they would be charged and when and where the
trials would take place. Usually the trials of poli- tical prisoners
are conducted in a special courthouse within the jail precincts.
Last month, a number of political prisoners were tried in Insein
Jail. When the NLD heard that U Win Htein and some others were going
to be produced at court on a certain day, a lawyer was sent to defend
them. The Special Branch officer at the jail questioned by the lawyer
said he did not know anything about a trial. But the trial took
place while the lawyer was waiting at the gate and continued after
he left in the afternoon. The next week, a number of lawyers again
went to Insein Jail, accompanied by the families of the prisoners,
on the day they had heard the trial was to continue. This time they
managed to get into the prison courthouse. However, they were only
allowed to cross-examine four of the 24 witnesses for the prosecution.
The next morning, the lawyers and the families of the prisoners
arrived in Insein Jail at 9 o'clock, as they had heard sentence
would be passed that day. The area around the jail entrance was
full of security personnel and all the shops along the road were
shut. The lawyers were refused entry. They were told the sentence
would only be passed at the end of the month and were asked to leave.
However, as the magistrate concerned with the case had been seen
at the Insein Township Magistrate's Court the lawyers were convinced
the trial was scheduled to proceed within a matter of hours and
continued to wait outside the jail.
The magistrate eventually arrived and entered the prison precincts
at around 2 o'clock and came out again after about 40 minutes. The
lawyers followed him to the Insein Township Court to ask what kind
of sentence had been passed. The magistrate, very nervous and surrounded
by security personnel, would only say that an application should
be made to copy the records of the court proceedings. Some days
later the government media announced that U Win Htein and others
had been given seven-year prison sentences each. The sight of kangaroos
bounding away across an open prairie can sometimes be rather beautiful.
The spectacle of the process of law bounding away from accepted
norms of justice is very ugly at all times.
.
|