|
Young Birds Outside Cages
The vast majority of my colleagues who were imprisoned
did not have the comfort of such an assurance. They knew well that
their families were in an extremely vulnerable position, in constant
danger of interrogations, house searches, general harassment and
interference with their means of livelihood. For those prisoners
with young children it was particularly difficult.
In Burma those who are held to endanger state security
can be arrested under a section of the law that allows detention
without trials for a maximum period of three years. And prisoners
who have not been tried are not entitled to visits from their families.
A number of political prisoners who were placed in jail for their
part in the democracy movement were kept without trial for more
than two years. For more than two years they did not see their families
at all.
Only after they were tried and sentenced were they
allowed family visits: these visits, permitted once a fortnight,
lasted for a mere 15 minutes at a time.
Two years is a long time in the life of a child.
It is long enough to forget a parent who has vanished from sight.
It is long enough for boys and girls to grow up into young adolescents.
It is long enough to turn a carefree youngster into a troubled human
being. Fifteen minutes once a fortnight is not enough to reverse
the effects on a child of the sudden absence of one of the two people
to whom it has habitually looked for protection and guidance. Nor
is it enough to bridge the gap created by a long separation.
A political prisoner failed to recognize in the teen-ager
who came to see him on the first family visit after more than two
years in detention the young son he had left behind. It was a situation
that was familiar to me. When I saw my younger son again for the
first time after a separation of two years and seven months he had
changed from a round faced not-quite-12-year-old into a rather stylish
"cool' teen-ager. If I had met him in the street I would not have
known him for my little son.
Political prisoners have to speak to their families
through a double barrier of iron grating and wire netting so that
no physical contact is possible. The children of one political prisoner
would make small holes in the netting and push their fingers through
to touch their father. When the holes got visibly large the jail
authorities had them patched up with thin sheets of tin. The children
would start all over again trying to bore a hole through to their
father: it is not the kind of activity one would wish for any child.
I was not the only woman political detainee in Burma:
there have been -- and their still remain -- a number of other women
imprisoned for their political beliefs. Some of these women had
young children who suddenly found themselves in the care of fathers
worried sick for their wives and totally unused to running a household.
Most of the children, except for those who were too young to understand
what was going on, suffered from varying degrees of stress.
Some children who went to elitist schools found that
their schoolmates avoided them and that even teachers treated them
with a certain reserve: it did not do to demonstrate sympathy for
the offspring of political prisoners and it was considered particularly
shocking if the prisoner was a woman.
Some children were never taken on visits to prison
as it was thought the experience would be too traumatic for them
so for years they were totally deprived of all contact with their
mothers. Some children who needed to be reassured that their mothers
still existed would be taken on a visit to the prison only to be
deeply disturbed by the sight of their mothers looking wan and strange
in their white jail garb.
When the parents are released from prison it is still
not the end of the story. The children suffer from a gnawing anxiety
that their fathers and mothers might once again be taken away and
placed out of their reach behind several barriers of brick and iron.
They have known what it is like to be young birds
fluttering helplessly outside the cages that shut their parents
away from them. They know that there will be security for their
families as long as freedom of thought and freedom of political
action are not guaranteed by the law of the land.
 |